a research on the veraciousness of an act done under hardship

among concepts influencing jurist’s verdicts notably areharm and hardship. what is for certain is that doing aharmful act is null and void. however, there is adisagreement among jurists as to veraciousness of an actdone under hardship. comparing it with harmful acts,some believe in its annulment. some other arguments arepresented for annulment, but all of them suffer from someproblems. criticizing proofs of those who believe inannulment of acts done under hardship and treating themas inadequate on the one hand and relying on jurists’argumentations and intellectual confirmation on the other,the present essay intends to prove veraciousness of actsdone under hardship and present criterion in thisconnection.